Famous couple took decision not to show their children to the public for a while. The pictures will be hidden from tabloids, breaking this “tradition” of posting photos, that existed previously.
Is it a girl or a boy? Or many ? When is the birth scheduled? What will be name of Prince Harry child, his title? “Baby Sussex”, the child of Prince Henry, Duke of Sussex, more commonly known as Harry, and his wife, Meghan, is expected for “late April, early May.” But one thing is already certain: the mystery maintained by his parents around this little being terribly annoys the British tabloids.
With her modern, Californian, feminist and eco-friendly style, Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex and former 37-year-old American actress, is about to test, once again, the limits of the aspiration to change “the firm”, the British royal family, on the occasion of the birth of his first Prince Harry child, who will be seventh in the order of succession to the throne.
A “tradition”, that is not so old
For this birth, and not only, the couple continues to do nothing like the rest of the royal family. “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are very grateful for the greetings they received from around the world as they get ready to welcome their babies,” Buckingham Palace said in a statement released on April 11. “Their royal highnesses have made the decision to keep private preparations for the arrival of the baby,” said the palace, noting that they “share the good news once they have celebrated it privately and with family”.
Harry and Meghan take the opposite of Prince William and his wife, Kate, who introduced their three children to the international media immediately after their birth. This time, the paparazzi are asked to go elsewhere. The day after the announcement, the Sun has been joking, taking almost republican accents, insinuating that the subjects of his majesty had a right of inspection over their royal highnesses:
“The public has the right to know the lives of those who are largely financed by their taxes. You can accept it or be private citizens. Not both. “
However, this “tradition” is not that old, says the Guardian: postpartum, only five royal couples have exhibited in front of the press the fruit of their bowels.
As if that were not enough, unlike Kate, Meghan would have chosen not to give birth in the chic Lindo private wing of St Mary’s Hospital, London, and would prefer a more “intimate”, says The Sun. “She just wants a natural birth of Prince Harry child, and natural to get to know her baby, without being pumped from head to toe just for the photos” at the exit of the hospital, says a source quoted by the newspaper.
This desire to preserve the intimacy of the couple and her baby is not surprising, recalls the New York Times. For their princely wedding, seen by hundreds of millions of viewers, they allowed only one photographer, Alexi Lubomirski, to enter the Chapel of St. George of Windsor. The American newspaper also interprets the will of Prince Harry to distance photographers by the circumstances of the death of his mother, Lady Diana, in Paris, August 31, 1997, while she was pursued by paparazzi.
The press is not limited to commenting on the relationship between the couple and the photographers. As any member of the royal family, the least of their choices are scrutinized, judged, extrapolated, even invented. Thus, according to the Daily Mail, Meghan would like to use vegan oil infused with eucalyptus oil for the decoration of the child’s room. A spokesman for the royal family also had to fend off a denial after several media claimed he wanted to provide his child with education based on the principle of gender neutrality.
© 20.04.2019 06:00PM Maskontravel Company LTD